Ashurst Governance and Compliance Update - Issue 31
23 December 2022
IN THIS EDITION WE COVER THE FOLLOWING: |
---|
AGMs and Annual Reporting in 2023 1. Our annual briefing to help you prepare for your AGM and annual report in 2023 |
Narrative and Financial Reporting 2. FRC publishes report on 'What makes good annual reports and accounts' 3. FRC announces areas of supervisory focus for 2023/24 4. FRS 102: draft amendments published |
Equity Capital Markets 5. FCA's latest Primary Market Bulletin focuses on climate-related reporting and UK MAR 6. FCA's Market Watch 71 focuses on Insider Lists 7. FCA publishes decision notices in relation to Metro Bank and two former executive directors |
The Edinburgh Reforms of financial services - implications for fund raisings 8. Chancellor publishes flagship reforms including illustrative reforms to the prospectus regime |
EU Developments 9. Gender diversity on boards: EU Directive published in Official Journal |
Employment 10. How flexible is flexible working about to become? |
AGMs and Annual Reporting in 2023 |
---|
1. Our annual briefing to help you prepare for your AGM and annual report in 2023We have recently published our annual briefing which summarises key developments to be aware of when preparing for 2023 annual general meetings and compiling the narrative aspects of annual reports. It is aimed principally at premium listed companies. It also covers material developments for standard listed companies, AIM companies and large private companies including: Considerations for 2023 AGMs
Considerations for 2023 narrative reporting
Please access the PDF of the briefing here and the online version here. On a related note, Georgeson has published a second 'Investor survey insights report' which focuses on how emerging ESG trends appear to be driving investor engagement and impacting voting and investment decisions. |
Narrative and Financial Reporting |
2. FRC publishes report on 'What makes good annual reports and accounts'The Financial Reporting Council has published the latest in its 'What makes a good' series, this time focusing on annual report and accounts, describing high quality annual reports as the cornerstone of corporate reporting. The document: sets out the FRC's view on the attributes of a good annual report and accounts; considers materiality; and looks at each of its corporate reporting principles and effective communication principles, giving examples of good reporting in each case. In doing so, it acknowledges that every business is different and, as a result, what a good annual report looks like will vary accordingly. The FRC states that a high quality annual report:
Helpfully, the report includes links to FRC resources and guidance on various aspects of corporate reporting. It also maps out the corporate reporting process and highlights areas for companies to consider when preparing accounts. 3. FRC announces areas of supervisory focus for 2023/24The FRC has announced its areas of supervisory focus for 2023/24, including priority sectors for corporate reporting reviews and audit quality inspections. In selecting both corporate reports and audits for review, the FRC will give priority to the following 'higher risk' sectors:
In addition, the FRC will conduct four thematic reviews during the next year including:
The FRC has stated that its Audit Quality Review team will pay particular attention in its audit quality inspections to areas including going concern, fraud risks, climate-related risks, and risk identification and assessment. Separately, the FRC has published its '2023-2026 draft 3-year Plan'. The plan is an update on its 2022-2025 Plan and reflects the 12 month delay to the anticipated legislation required to create the FRC's successor body, the Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority (ARGA). Finally, the FRC Lab has published a newsletter focusing on corporate reporting in the year ahead. This aggregates all significant FRC and FRC Lab publications and is designed to assist reporting teams in preparing their annual reports in the coming months. 4. FRS 102: draft amendments publishedThe FRC has published draft amendments to FRS 102 (The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland) resulting from the second periodic review of FRS 102 and other financial reporting standards. The proposed amendments include providing greater clarity for small entities in the UK regarding which disclosures need to be provided in order to give a 'true and fair view'. The proposed effective date for these amendments is accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025, with early application permitted provided that all amendments are applied at the same time. The amendments include transitional provisions. Comments on the draft amendments should be submitted to the FRC by 30 April 2023. |
Equity Capital Markets |
5. FCA's latest Primary Market Bulletin focuses on climate-related reporting and UK MARThe Financial Conduct Authority has published the 42nd edition of its Primary Market Bulletin, in which it covers the following:
Further detail on selected items is set out below. Climate-related disclosure requirementsThe Bulletin provides a reminder of the FCA's rules, guidance and expectations in relation to such disclosures including by:
In terms of next steps, the FCA states that it will:
Unlawful disclosure by Sir Christopher Gent – key issuesThe FCA refers to the financial penalty of £80,000 it imposed on Sir Christopher Gent (former Chairman of Convatec Group plc) – see AGC update, Issue 25 - for unlawfully disclosing inside information in breach of Article 10 of the EU Market Abuse Regulation (EU MAR) and notes that the decision has generated significant market and media commentary about both the specific case and Article 10 of EU MAR more broadly. The key issues relating to unlawful disclosure as far as the FCA is concerned include:
Unlawful disclosure: Themes and behaviours from Market Oversight enquiriesThe Bulletin also looks at general themes arising, and 'concerning behaviours' identified, in enquiries which the FCA's Primary Market Oversight (PMO) department has carried out in respect of suspected unlawful disclosures. Examples are set out so that issuers can consider how they can mitigate or avoid such risks in future. The FCA starts by referring to the following legislation and rules which are critical to its observations:
The FCA then makes the following observations:
6. FCA's Market Watch 71 focuses on Insider ListsThe FCA has published Market Watch 71 which makes various observations on how investment and advisory firms produce and maintain insider lists. These provide relevant insights for all market participants subject to the UK MAR regime, particularly confirmation of the FCA's views on what constitutes the UK's 'national identification number'. Steps taken by firms to reduce permanent insider listsThe FCA has seen considerable reductions in the numbers of permanent insiders at several advisory firms (since the publication of Market Watch 60 in 2019), together with enhanced monitoring of access to inside information. Methods to reduce the number of permanent insiders (from which issuers might learn) have included:
In the FCA's view, the ongoing reduction in the numbers of those able to access inside information enhances the integrity of UK markets by reducing the opportunities for unlawful disclosure of that information. Insider lists, Article 18 of UK MAR and the sufficiency of personal informationThe FCA has received insider lists in response to regulatory requests which do not contain personal information, other than names, and stresses that additional information, such as telephone numbers, dates of birth and national identification numbers, are also required to enable it to eliminate people from its enquiries. Insider lists must be in the required format and include information set out in relevant technical standards. The FCA also sets out the responses to various queries it has received, including:
7. FCA publishes decision notices in relation to Metro Bank and two former executive directorsThe FCA has published a final notice in relation to Metro Bank PLC and fined it approximately £10 million for breaching Listing Rule 1.3.3R by publishing inaccurate information to investors. The FCA has also published decision notices in relation to Metro Bank's former CEO and former CFO for being knowingly concerned in the breach, fining them £223,000 and £134,000 respectively. As the former executive directors have appealed their decisions to the Upper Tribunal, the fines imposed on them are provisional at this stage. By way of reminder, in December 2021, the Prudential Regulation Authority fined Metro Bank £5.4 million for matters relating to the misstatement. FactsAs part of its quarterly financial results, Metro Bank regularly reported to the market on its prudential position, including the Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) on which its regulatory capital requirements are based. In its Q3 trading update released in October 2018, Metro Bank published inaccurate information concerning the figure for its RWA, in breach of Listing Rule 1.3.3R, which requires an issuer to take reasonable care to ensure that any information it notifies to a RIS or makes available through the FCA is not misleading, false or deceptive and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of the information. The RWA figure had particular significance for Metro Bank given its business model and intended growth strategy: an increase in RWA could lead to an increased regulatory capital requirement and the need to raise further capital, with the potential resultant risk of dilution for existing shareholders and drag on the bank's rate of growth. It was not until 23 January 2019, when Metro Bank issued its full year 2018 Results Preview and Trading Update, that it corrected the RWA figure. In that Update, it announced an expected increase in RWA to 'approximately £8.9 billion'. The error itself was first mentioned during an analyst presentation call later the same day, during which the CFO stated that the estimated increase in RWA included adjustments of 'around £900 million'. Following the Update, Metro Bank's share price fell by 39 per cent - the largest single price drop for a UK bank since 2009. FCA findingsThe FCA found that Metro Bank was aware of the market significance of its RWA figures, which had been the subject of both analyst commentary and specific questioning at an analyst meeting prior to the inaccurate announcement. However, when the inaccurate RWA figure was published in the misleading announcement, Metro Bank failed to explain that (a) the risk weighting which had been applied was incorrect; (b) Metro Bank had recognised that it needed to correct this error; (c) Metro Bank was carrying out an ongoing review to determine the quantum of the correction; and (d) the quantum of the correction would be substantial. The FCA highlighted that, although Metro Bank sought and received legal advice from its external lawyers on whether it was required to make a proactive announcement about its miscalculation of the risk weighting (prior to the release of the announcement), Metro Bank did not return to its external lawyers to seek advice specifically in relation to the announcement, and whether that announcement could properly give an RWA figure that was based on an incorrect risk weighting. In the FCA's view, this was a key reason why Metro Bank was considered to have failed to take reasonable care in breach of Listing Rule 1.3.3R. According to the FCA, the CEO and CFO were knowingly concerned in Metro Bank's breach of the Listing Rules. They were aware that the RWA figure in the announcement was materially inaccurate but they failed to consider whether the inaccurate RWA figure needed to be qualified or explained and did not seek legal advice on this question. Further, they failed to ensure that the Audit Committee and the board considered whether the inclusion of the inaccurate RWA figure in the announcement without any qualification was appropriate. SanctionsThe FCA has imposed a fine of £10,002,300 on Metro Bank. In assessing the seriousness of the breach, the FCA considered the appropriate indicator to be Metro Bank’s average daily market capitalisation throughout the period of the breach as this reflects the harm or risk of harm resulting from the breach. In assessing the factor of deterrence, the FCA highlighted the fact that Metro Bank is a premium listed issuer and, at the time of the breach, was a constituent of the FTSE 250 index, and in order to achieve the objective of credible deterrence, the FCA applied a multiplier of two to the penalty calculation. Commenting on the decisions, Mark Steward, Executive Director of FCA Enforcement and Market Oversight, said: 'Listed firms must ensure that the information they are disclosing to the market is right. This is what investors are entitled to receive……The UK's Listing Rules impose high standards on issuers and their officers which Metro Bank [and the relevant executives] failed to meet in this case.' The Metro Bank decision follows a number of recent FCA enforcement cases in which it has found a breach of LR 1.3.3R including in relation to Barclays Bank plc, Carillion plc (in liquidation) and Aviva plc. |
The Edinburgh Reforms of financial services - implications for fund raisings |
8. Chancellor publishes flagship reforms including illustrative reforms to the prospectus regimeThe Chancellor has unveiled the "Edinburgh Reforms" of UK financial services, consisting of over 30 regulatory reforms, which aim to drive growth and competitiveness in the UK financial services sector. The reforms build on the government's vision for UK financial services in a post-Brexit landscape, presented in the (then) Chancellor's 2021 Mansion House speech. HMT's Policy Statement, published as part of the Edinburgh Reforms, sets out the government's implementation plan to repeal EU retained laws governing financial services and to deliver a comprehensive 'FSMA model' of regulation through the powers established in the Financial Services and Markets Bill, which is currently before Parliament. Under this model, financial services regulators will be responsible for determining the regulatory requirements that are currently set out in retained EU law, within a regulatory framework that is more agile, responsive and tailored to the UK's needs. UK prospectus regimeA key element of the Edinburgh Reforms is the overhaul of the UK prospectus regime, the overarching aim of which is to increase the attractiveness of London as an international listing venue. The Edinburgh Reforms also cover new remit letters for the FCA and the PRA, with clear, targeted recommendations on growth and international competitiveness, the ring-fencing regime, and the implementation of the outcomes of the UK Secondary Capital Raising Review (see AGC Update – Issue 23), amongst many other reforms. As part of this new approach to financial services, the government has published three illustrative statutory instruments, including the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Public Offers and Admissions to Trading) Regulations 2023 (POAT SI). These demonstrate how new powers to repeal and replace retained EU law being taken forward in the Financial Services and Markets Bill will be used - in the case of the POAT SI, to replace the existing UK Prospectus Regulation with a more effective regulatory framework for prospectuses and public offers. It is intended that the POAT SI will implement the recommendations of Lord Hill's UK Listings Review, with a view to widening participation in the ownership of public companies, simplifying the capital raising process for companies on UK markets and increasing the attractiveness of the UK for companies looking to list. However, the POAT SI is not in final form and will continue to be developed before being put before Parliament. The accompanying Policy Note stresses that important issues, including details in respect of enforcement, general transitional provisions, and the full scope of the consequential amendments across other legislation have intentionally not been included at this stage. Key prospectus regime changesThe illustrative POAT SI covers most of the proposals in HMT's UK Prospectus Regime Review (see AGC Update – Issue 14) which sets out the policy approach the government will take to reform the UK's prospectus regime, including:
Overall, the effect of this legislation will be to delegate a greater degree of responsibility to the FCA to put in place a regime that is tailored to the needs of UK markets and reflects the difference between public offers and admissions of securities to trading. As such, the full suite of reforms will take effect after the FCA has consulted on and, in some cases, implemented relevant rules. For the view of our Financial Regulation team on the Reforms more generally – click here. EU Capital Markets Union ProposalsIt is perhaps no coincidence to report that the European Commission has published a package of proposals to develop the EU's Capital Markets Union by, amongst other things, reducing the regulatory burden on companies so that they can better access public funding by listing on stock exchanges. The proposed amendments to the EU prospectus regime include extending the exemptions for secondary issuances of securities fungible with securities admitted to trading on a regulated market or on an SME growth market, standardising and streamlining a prospectus for primary issuances and providing for a new EU 'follow-on' prospectus to replace the current 'simplified disclosure regime' for secondary issuances. |
EU Developments |
9. Gender diversity on boards: EU Directive published in Official JournalIn AGC update, Issue 27, we reported on the EU's proposals to increase gender diversity in listed company boardrooms. The relevant Directive (EU 2022/2381) has now been published in the Official Journal. It will come into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Journal, and will expire on 31 December 2038. EU Member States must adopt the required national measures by 28 December 2024; many have already done so. By way of reminder, the Directive applies to companies which have their registered office in an EU Member State and whose shares are admitted to trading on an EU regulated market. The Directive does not apply to UK companies, however those with securities admitted to an EU regulated market should consider whether they wish to meet the Directive’s targets on a voluntary basis. |
Employment |
10. How flexible is flexible working about to become?Following the pandemic, many organisations have staff working flexibly at least some of the time. Building on its manifesto commitment to encourage flexible working, the government has published the response to its 2021 consultation, 'Making Flexible Working the Default'. Our Employment team briefing considers the government's key proposals and how flexible working is set to change. Item contributed by Crowley Woodford and Ruth Buchanan, Partners in our Employment team. |
If you would like to receive future Ashurst Governance and Compliance updates, please contact our Data Compliance Team on Central.DataGovernance@ashurst.com.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.