Australia's offshore wind industry: 2024 year in review
11 February 2025

The industry has taken significant steps in the past 12 months with regulatory and ministerial declarations across the OFW priority areas as set out in the table below:
State | Declared area | Declared date | Maximum size | Status |
Vic | Gippsland | 19 December 2022 | 15,000km2 | 12 FLs granted between April and July for 12 projects for a combined capacity of 25 gigawatts ('GW'). Developers are moving forward, evaluating the feasibility of their proposed OFW projects. |
Vic | Southern Ocean | 6 March 2024 | 1,030km2 | Preliminary decision to award FL to Spinifex project |
NSW | Illawarra | 15 June 2024 | 1,022 km2 | FL applications under assessment |
NSW | Hunter | 12 July 2023 | 1,854km2 | Preliminary decision to award FL to the Novocastrian Wind Pty Ltd |
WA | Indian Ocean off Bunbury | 30 August 2024 | 3,995 km2 | FL applications open from 3 Sep 2024 - 30 Jan 2025. |
Tas | Bass Strait | 12 December 2024 | 7,100 km2 | FL applications open from 12 Dec 2024 -12 Mar 2025. |
Seadragon Offshore Wind Pty Ltd applied for a feasibility licence in the Gippsland declared zone. The application area overlapped with the area of more meritorious feasibility licence applications. At the time, the Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Regulations 2022 were silent on the issue of overlapping claims of unequal merit. The Minister refused to grant the licence because he believed he did not have the power to grant a feasibility licence for an area smaller than the area described in the relevant feasibility licence application. Seadragon brought judicial review proceedings.
As explained in our 23 December 2024 alert "Minister's refusal to grant an Offshore Wind Feasibility Licence overturned", in November 2024 the Federal Court set aside the Minister's decision refusing to grant the feasibility licence to Seadragon. It held that the Minister erred in believing he did not have the power to grant a feasibility licence for an area smaller than the area described in the relevant feasibility licence application. The Minister was ordered to redetermine the application according to law.
In response to the Seadragon decision, in December 2024 the Government inserted a new section 11A into the OEI Regulations (Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Amendment (Overlapping Applications) Regulations 2024 (Cth)) clarifying that, where a feasibility licence application overlaps another application with unequal merit, the Minister must not grant a licence in respect of the application of lower merit. This new section effectively confirms the approach the Minister took in the Seadragon matter.
For more information about this decision, see our 23 December 2024 alert "Minister's refusal to grant an Offshore Wind Feasibility Licence overturned".
The much-awaited Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Amendment Regulations 2024 (Cth) (OEI Amendment Regulations) came into force on 12 December 2024. As a result, the Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Regulations 2021 (Cth) (OEI Regulations) now provide the detail which offshore wind developers need to progress the design of their projects, prepare and consult on management plans, and carry out feasibility activities.
Together with the Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Amendment (Overlapping Applications) Regulations 2024 (Cth), these amendments represent the largest update to the OEI Regulations since their commencement in 2021.
The OEI Amendment Regulations cover:
Watch out for our alert series about these reforms, the first of which will be published shortly.
The Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 was passed on 28 November 2024. The Bill seeks to establish the National Interest Framework to secure Australia's place in the changing global environment, including through supporting private sector investment in Australia's move towards net zero.
The 2024-2025 Federal Budget identifies five priority industries are under the National Interest Framework:
We wrote about these developments in our 17 May 2024 alert "Supporting a future 'Made in Australia' – Energy policy announcements in the 2024-25 Federal Budget".
Victoria is an attractive proposition for the development of OFW and has comparative advantages to other Australian states. These include the shallower waters of the Bass Strait enabling the development of fixed bottom OFW projects (a more mature technology and significantly cheaper than floating OFW) and it is the location of Australia's first proposed OFW project, the Star of the South. With stakeholder engagement on OFW in Gippsland since 2016, versus the minimum 60 day public consultation period undertaken elsewhere under the OEI Framework, the region has not experienced the same level of stakeholder backlash seen elsewhere. Victorian Government is seeking to capitalise on the opportunity OFW presents with a range of legislative and policy supports.
Developments in Victoria are outlined below.
VicGrid released a tender document on 10 December 2024 for a Public private partnership (PPP) model for the delivery of a Gippsland onshore connection hub to support Victoria's OFW projects, with capacity to receive and transmit 2 GW of electricity. The cost is expected to range between A$700m and A$1.5bn.
Victoria is the only state so far to legislate specific OFW targets. The Climate Change and Energy Legislation Amendment (Renewable Energy and Storage Targets) Act 2024 sets out the following OFW targets:
2GW | By 2032 |
4GW | By 2035 |
9GW | By 2040 |
The Energy and Public Land Legislation Amendment (Enabling Offshore Wind Energy) Act 2024 (Vic) facilitates the grant of licences over public land not covered by the OEI Act for up to 21 years, including for the purpose of assessing the feasibility of constructing OFW energy generation.
The National Electricity (Victoria) Amendment (VicGrid) Bill 2024 ensures the Victorian government has powers to modernise the way new energy infrastructure is planned and developed in Victoria. It prioritises community consultation, gives communities, farmers and Traditional Owners a voice in the planning process. It confirms the central role of VicGrid in delivering transmission and connection infrastructure for OFW in Victoria.
The Victorian Government is the only state that has proposed a CfD tender. Further details below.
Beyond policy certainty (with the accompanying legislative framework), a study of established OFW markets abroad demonstrates that government revenue support will be critical to a successful OFW industry in Australia.
The Victorian Government is the only state, at this stage, that has proposed a CfD tender.
Offshore Wind Energy Victoria's Implementation Statement 3 provides some detail on the proposed CfD scheme in Victoria including a commitment to support 2GW of capacity in the first auction. Implementation Statement 3 sets out the timeline for the first CfD auction as follows:
There is industry speculation that the EOI may not be released pending the outcome of this year's federal election (that must occur prior to 17 May 2025). For some proponents, the delay is welcome given the early stage of their feasibility work, which would have put them at a disadvantage to others.
Nonetheless, if the government provides certainty of regular/annual CfD auctions in a similar manner to the Capacity Investment Scheme, there could be advantages to proceeding early. This includes facilitating the advanced projects to proceed and propel the sector forward and underwriting an industry at scale to attract the supply chain. For more information about the Capacity Investment Scheme, see our August 2023 alerts "Australia's CIS – new support for clean dispatchable projects (Part 1)" and "Australia's CIS – new support for clean dispatchable projects (Part 2)".
In the UK, CfD auction rounds have generally been conducted following extensive survey work, project proponents having progressed engineering works and securing grid connection agreements. This has improved the reliability of data CfD bids are based upon.
UK CfD auction rounds encompass offshore and onshore wind but historically offshore has dominated the bids. There have been six competitive auction rounds completed for CfDs in the UK between 2015 and 2024. Importantly, developers did not submit bids in the fifth round as the CfD strike price did not keep up with rising development costs (due to high inflation, high cost of capital and supply chain issues), such that the CfD did not support project viability.
Even in the most established OFW markets globally, appropriate government support remains critical to project viability.
While globally OFW developers face macroeconomic challenges such as supply chain capacity and rising costs, Australia has its own unique set of challenges.
Vessel procurement |
|
High costs |
|
Local content requirements |
|
OFW projects require ports that can accommodate large vessels, heavy equipment, and specialised services for installation, operations, and maintenance of OFW turbines and infrastructure. However, most ports in Australia are not yet equipped or designed for these purposes and require substantial investment and upgrades.
The Victorian Government had planned to redevelop the Port of Hastings for this purpose but its Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act) referral was rejected at the close of 2023, leading the Victorian Government to redesign its plans for the Port of Hastings and to consider a broader, multi-port, strategy in order to support the development of the OFW industry. As a result we have seen announcements such as the Bell Bay Renewable Energy Services Hub.
The Tasmanian Government has committed $5 million to develop a Renewable Energy Services Hub at Bell Bay, aiming to support Tasmania's goal of achieving a renewable energy target of 200% renewables by 2040. According to the CSIRO, the Hub will focus on providing services, including manufacturing, logistics and maintenance, for onshore and offshore wind renewable energy projects.
Renewables, Climate and Future Industries Tasmania is collaborating with local businesses to leverage economic development opportunities arising from renewable energy projects. This initiative is expected to drive economic and job growth, enhance local industry capabilities, and position Bell Bay as a strategic precinct for renewable energy projects both within Tasmania and across Australia.
OFW projects require environmental and other approvals (eg Aboriginal cultural heritage and vegetation removal permits) in addition to the licences required under the OEI Act.
At a Commonwealth level, OFW projects need to be referred under the EPBC Act. The newly amended OEI Regulations make clear that management plans must describe a project proponent's obligations under the EPBC Act and the measures it will take to comply. Guidance released in December 2024 confirms that management plans will need to describe compliance measures in a way that ensures compliance can be monitored and verified. If potential non-compliance with EPBC Act obligations is identified, the OIR and DCCEEW (regulator of the EPBC Act) will work together to enforce compliance.
Although it is clear a referral, and likely an EIS, will be required under the EPBC Act, industry proponents and communities are still waiting on clarity about the State and Territory environmental assessment pathways. This has implications for how both federal and State/Territory environmental matters are assessed. The usual practice is for federal matters to be assessed together with State/Territory matters as part of a "bilateral process" (ie an accredited process under a bilateral agreement between the Commonwealth and the relevant State or Territory). However, most offshore wind infrastructure will be located in Commonwealth waters, rather than in a State or Territory jurisdiction. As a result, there is a question of what "work" the State or Territory assessments will do, and whether the impact at the State or Territory level is sufficient to warrant comprehensive assessments.
Further guidance is expected on how Commonwealth and State/Territory environmental regulations will interact.
OFW projects present potential impacts on First Nations' rights and interests including through the installation of infrastructure within native title determined land or impacts on onshore and underwater cultural heritage and connection to Sea Country. The OEI Regulations provide a broad requirement for project proponents to make reasonable efforts to identify and consult with Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander peoples or groups with interests in, or management functions related to, the relevant licence area or an area adjacent to the licence area (this includes native title interests, or land or water rights under federal or state-based agreements).
But protection of cultural heritage is only part of the story. There is a growing push from Government, banks and other financiers and the community for Traditional Owners to share in the benefits of Australia's energy transition and for agreements to be reached before projects proceed.
In February 2024, the Clean Energy Council (co-authored with KPMG) released Leading Practice Principles: First Nations and Renewable Energy Projects. This guide provides best practice principles for engagement, participation and benefit-sharing for renewable energy projects. In September 2024, the Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation (GLaWAC) published its 'Pathway to Partnership: Gunaikurnai and Major Projects' which establishes an engagement framework for proponents to follow when developing projects on Gunaikurnai lands or waters, including OFW projects in the Gippsland region.
The free, prior and informed consent standard for agreement making (or FPIC) continues to be an influential concept in the development of legislation, guidelines and the expectations of Traditional Owners, including in relation to OFW projects. At the moment the law lags behind evolving community expectations, but the trend is clear. For more on FPIC, see our 4 June 2024 article "FPIC continues to dominate the discourse".
The relative infancy of Australia's OFW industry enables Australia to learn from the experiences of OFW markets globally. It is an opportunity for federal and state governments to build on work to date and ensure Australia presents a competitive global opportunity that attracts the necessary investment, skills and supply chain to develop an OFW industry that delivers for the Australian people.
However, with the federal election this year there will be increased scrutiny of Australia's plans to achieve its energy transition. The Opposition has announced plans if elected to support nuclear energy and cancel the Hunter OFW feasibility license (currently a preliminary award). Without government support, the OFW industry will face a challenging path, as evidenced by the need for government support in even the most developed OFW markets globally.
Authors: Bree Miechel, Partner; Clare Lawrence, Partner; Jeff Lynn, Partner; Murray Wheater, Partner; Kimberley Garth, Senior Associate; Robert Gough, Senior Associate; Chris Primmer, Senior Associate; Anna Seddon, Senior Associate; Vanessa Asumugha, Lawyer; Fergus Calwell, Lawyer and Gerard McGookin, Lawyer.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.